3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes. 11 ) CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). ) Hours: Public Hours: 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. ) 12 MOTION TO CHANGE SUPPORT ORDER RE: CHILD SUPPO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Respondent filed Fresno County Court Case 20CECL04302 on August 17, 2020. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH As with demurrers, the defect must appear on the face of the complaint or in matters judicially noticeable. 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) ) ) 9 SUNG MO CHUNG, ) Department: 403 ) ) ) San Francisco Superior Court conducting settlement conferences for the civil and unlawful detainer calendars (2007 - 2011) and hearing discovery motions (2012 - 2014). ) 5 (Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2004.). ) Generally, a courts power to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the judgment was clerical. CCP section 473(d); 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. (CCP 430.10(e); Fox v. JAMDAT Mobile, Inc. (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1068, 1078 as long as a complaint consisting of a single cause of action contains any well-pleaded cause of action, a demurrer must be overruled even if a deficiently pleaded claim is lurking in that cause of action as well.) In pleading, the actual content of the allegations is more important than the express title or identification of causes of action. ) Defendants counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. 11 ) 6 STEPHEN WAHL, ) Case Number: FDI-18-789406 ) See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Despite further warning signs and the fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge him without doing more. Department 22. A memorandum that exceeds 15 pages must also include an opening summary of argument. The court may take judicial notice of court records of this state. 11 ) 6 EUGENE CARVELL LEDBETTER, ) Case Number: FDV-19-814896 Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. If you are unable to find your San Francisco Family Law dissolution case online, please contact Client Support at 888-529-7587. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) 6 MICHAEL JOHN NAPOLITANA, ) Case Number: FDI-18-790530 ) (415) 551-3747, Judge Maria E. Evangelista 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT [G]iven the private nature of a confidential settlement of a lawsuit, the burden rests on the proponents of discovery of this information to justify compelling production of this material. january 18, 2023 law and motion calendar page 9 judge: honorable marie s. weiner, department 2 _____ 2:00 21-udl-00401 are-san francisco no. 11 ) The item number (to the left of your case number on the Tentative Ruling) 5 5 Sacramento County Superior Court Prerogative Writ Departments. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 (1984) 151 Cal.App.3d 447, 449. 13 TENTATIVE RULING CCP . List of San Mateo Superior Court Civil Judges and information on Civil Direct Calendars Print (See Saunders, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at p. 9 JUAN J CRUZ, ) Department: 403 9 SIDDHARTH BREJA, ) Department: 404 Civic Center Courthouse Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. ) ) (1987) 194 Cal..App.3d 1023, 1027 (judgment amended to add defendant corporations alter ego, in control of the litigation, as additional judgment debtor on ground that omission was misnomer). (CRC 3.1322.) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 ) 5 Law and Motion (559) 457 . ) San Francisco, CA 94102 When an arbitration occurs in only one county, that county is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award. ) Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. (I)f a party fails to show that a judgment has been taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect the court may not grant relief. ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT When I go to file stuff in the clerk's office it's great to see all the grungy bike messengers mixed up with the attorneys, and the clerk windows have a really sexy art deco font painted everywhere. 6 CHRISTOFFER STANFORD THYGESEN, ) Case Number: FDV-19-814465 SFPKOA has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473(b). If the tentative ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated. ) 11 ) Co. v. Industrial Acci. 9 JACQUEZ BURNS, ) Department: 403 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Plaintiff Gloria Aguilera (Plaintiff), filed the complaint against defendants Baltazar Lopez Guzman, Arnulfo Garcia Mendoza (together Defendants) along with Does 1-100, arising out of an automobile related incident (the Complaint). ) Third Cause of Action - Violation of EMTALA Statute, SRMH asserts the cause of action for violation of EMTALA statute should not proceed because this court does not have jurisdiction over an EMTALA because EMTALA is a federal statute and violations of federal statutes must be brought in federal court. (MP&A p. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT No in-person appearances will be permitted. There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE REQUEST FOR MONETARY A 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) While Plaintiff alleges outrageous and prejudicial conduct, he fails to allege extreme conduct by SRMH, which is an essential element of the cause of action. Prac. Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f), 1987.1; see also Monarch Healthcare v. Sup.Ct. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 Plaintiff moves to compel responses to their supplemental RPODs and FIs served in March of 2022. Plaintiffs have provided no authority to the contrary. After extensions, SFPKOA served responses on May 25, 2021. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-18-353262 Effective September 6, 2021, unless the court otherwise orders, participants may attend their hearing remotely. ) Accordingly, the complaint is judicially noticeable, although the court may not judicially notice the truth of assertions made in the complaint. Print | E-mail 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Oppression means despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person's rights. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. Upon the hearing of the motion the court shall, if it appears that the action or proceeding was not commenced in the proper court, order the action or proceeding transferred to the proper court.. 6 ) 5 5 ) Effective Monday, July 19, 2021, all persons entering any court facility will be required to properly wear a face covering over their nose and mouth, regardless of their vaccination status. A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. 11 ) ) 11 ) H. Eleventh Cause of Action - Punitive Damages. ) 13 TEN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT See also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. 5 A case citation must include the official report volume and page number and year of decision. San Francisco, CA 94102 It is uncontested that UPA has served supplemental responses at the time of this hearing. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Scheduling a Hearing (Ex Parte and Noticed Motion), 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. 5 Therefore, the Court cannot find that UPA has waived their objections. When a consumer has served such objections, the party seeking the information has the burden of moving the court to enforce the subpoena. Plaintiff served SFPKOA with form interrogatories, requests for admissions, special interrogatories, and requests for production of documents on April 14, 2021. 11 ) 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHAN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO After submission of the order, the Court will sign the Amended Judgment. Room 402 G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior Court(1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 22, 28. ) 9 MEGHAN WAHL, ) Department: 403 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ), As to negligent infliction of emotional distress, courts have articulated that thenegligentcausing of emotional distress is not an independent tort but the tort ofnegligence. (Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc.(1989) 48 Cal.3d 583, 588 citing 6 Witkin, Summary of Cal. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE SPOU 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Tentative Rulings for Civil and Family Law matters. Department 403 When considering demurrers, courts read the allegations liberally and in context. Additionally, the motion must advise the attorney that joint and several liability against the attorney is sought for the sanctions. Ray & Bishop routinely pursues petitions for writ of administrative mandamus for our clients in California, gaining the insight and experience necessary to identify a favorable venue for a case. The Court signed the order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022, in open court, with Ms. Smith present. (Complaint, 75.) You must serve the other party or their lawyer with a copy of your motion. 12 ORDER OF EXAMINATION ISSUED In the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY; REQUEST FOR O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) The application must state reasons why the argument cannot be made within the stated limit. 11 ) The Court finds that a total of three hours across two motions at the reasonable rate of $495/hr is appropriate, plus $60 of filing fees per motion are all reasonable. 11 ) 573, 574; Thomson v. L.C. 6 ROSANA WIECKS, ) Case Number: FDI-10-771615 For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) ) Oscar Pardo has recused self from this case. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 CRYSTAL HOUSTON SIEGLER, ) Department: 404 9:11-13.) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA A recording of available law and motion and discovery calendar dates is available by telephone: 408-882-2100, press 6, then 5 . 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) 5 (See CCP 430.10(e).) 6 RADHEY SHYAM, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 ANTHONY SINGER, ) Department: 404 Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings Effective January 1, 2021, San Mateo Superior Court is a direct calendar court for all Civil Matters. It is now for . ) ) In reviewing all of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive. However, when a plaintiff suffers a single personal injury by reason of the wrongful act of a defendant, there is ordinarily only one cause of action. ) ) 5 ) Departments 403/404 will continue to post tentative rulings scheduling mediations and hearing dates pursuant to San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 11.7(D)(3) and . 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 ) However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. The moving party shall file a declaration with the demurrer as to the meet and confer efforts. ) A conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice. A primary basis for Plaintiffs claims is that she was entitled to disability accommodations because her husband, Joe, was immune-compromised and of a group particularly vulnerable to Covid-19. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Actions against corporations are triable in the county where it has its principal place of business, where the contract was made or to be performed (whether specified in writing or not), or where the obligation or liability arose or the breach occurred. 11 ) 11 ) ) 6 CHRISTOPHER JAMES RIVERS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 The right of privacy protects a partys medical records even if the information is relevant to the litigation. The Court particularly noted that Ms. Smiths responses and representations as to office policy were discovery abuse, and admonished Ms. Smith on the record. 13 TENTATIVE RULING In every case, to present an ex parte application to the court, a party must: California Rules of Court 3.1200 et seq. Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Determining Good Faith Settlement . Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in San Francisco County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. ) ) (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1290. CCP 2031.300(c) & 2033.280(c). If a party fails serve a timely response, the court shall impose sanctions unless it finds that the party subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. ) 11 ) A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s] or is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court. CCP 436(b). ) Ct. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 211, 214 (motion to strike lies against request for punitive damages when the claim sued upon would not support an award of punitive damages as a matter of law). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 11 ) Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. The actions undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary. San Francisco Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 (415) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 (415) 551-5869 . ) ) ) ) Untimely responses to discovery requests waive all objections. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Failure to verify responses is equivalent to serving no responses at all. Rule of Court, Rule 8.54 is inapplicable, as it is a rule applying to appellate matters. Plaintiff Cliff R. Russell (Plaintiff) filed the presently operative first amended complaint (FAC) against defendant Robert J. Russell, trustee of the Robert John Russell Trust (Defendant). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Moreover, as Defendant points out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and thus the records and information, directly at issue. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates San Francisco County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 DANIEL ANTHONY LEYVA, ) Department: 404 Attn: Appellate Court Services. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355509 9 JAMES M. BATARA SEVERSON, ) Department: 403 ) ) 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 Judge Maria E. Evangelista Civic Center Courthouse Department 403 Court Clerk (415) 551-3741 Judge Daniel A. Flores Civic Center Courthouse Department 404 Court Clerk (415) 551-3744 Judge Roger C. Chan Civic Center Courthouse Department 405 San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 The Motion is DENIED. ) ) However, Defendant has provided no authority or showing that the default is void in total. SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; ORDER TO SHOW CAU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 TESSA LUU, ) Case Number: FDI-17-787511 9:1-3.). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 9 TIMOTHY HEFFERNAN, ) Department: 403 5 Read Calendar User Agreement and select "I Agree", Enter your Case Number and select "Submit". 11 ) Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing 10 Days After Service of Notice > > Read More.. Cut-Off Date. ) Huh v. Wang(2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. ) ) There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. Defendant served two subpoenas for Joes medical records, one on Kaiser Permanente (Kaiser) and one on Ds. 5 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355607 The Court is predominantly seeking attorneys interested in assisting incarcerated individuals with their civil actions. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) Petitioner was aware of the existence of this case as early as July 29, 2021, and very likely before, as it was a petition to compel the arbitration at issue here. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Judges often set a motion cut-off date or deadline. 6 SARAH POOLE, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816259 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Alexander v. Superior Court(2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 723, 727. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Although this is a single department hearing many types of law and motion cases, Department 302 has decided many important petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. 9 WEN MIN JIANG, ) Department: 403 The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Generally, supplemental demands to interrogatories may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior answers to interrogatories be updated and affirmed. ) ) Department 406 ) Second and Sixth Causes of Action Negligence and Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress, SRMH asserts the causes of action for negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress should not proceed because they are duplicative of the cause of action for medical malpractice, which Plaintiff alleges as the first cause of action. For Case Management Conferences, Law and Motion hearings, and Ex Parte hearings, parties may appear remotely pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. . 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) ) All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. A contract is entered into where acceptance occurred. Petitioner is required to pay costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court to the Fresno County Superior Court. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF TEMPORARY EMER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 7 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. 9 VIDA YEUNG-SHUMSKAS, ) Department: 404 In order to avail themselves of the mandatory relief provision after imposition of terminating sanctions, responses compliant with the courts prior order must be served in order to make the request for mandatory relief in proper form. 11 ) 5 **This is the end of the Tentative Rulings. ) 6 GISELA CHRISTINE MARQUEZ GELLIDON, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796947 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 SHAUN MICHAUX, ) Department: 404 (2) If a California case is cited before the time it is published in the advance sheets of the Official Reports, the party must include the title, case number, date of decision, and, if from the Court of Appeal, district of the Court of Appeal in which the case was decided. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. Plaintiff shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). The court must balance the interests, weighing the privacy right at issue against the public interest in obtaining just results. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) 11 ) This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. (Subd (k) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (g) effective July 1, 1997; previously relettered as subd (h) effective July 1, 2000, and as subd (l) effective January 1, 2007; previously amended and relettered as subd (j) effective January 1, 2004.). Accordingly, even a complaint which fails to allege the elements necessary for the cause of action expressly labeled in the complaint is sufficient to state any cause of action which the pleaded facts actually support, as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory. (Ibid. Court Clerk File & ServeXpress has been providing electronic filing and service in San Francisco Superior Court cases since 1998. . ) ) ) (CCP 452; Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081. (415) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse The San Francisco Superior Court is currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati. ) ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Case Number: FDV-17-813112 ) Courtroom I. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) Where no response was served to a FI, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to meet and confer. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 The Court will be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances. Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. ) ) ) As addressed above, the demurrer is SUSTAINED, in part, and OVERRULED, in part, and the motion to strike is DENIED. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF 1.TH 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). Writs of Administrative Mandamus in Other Superior Courts. 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 All pending and newly filed civil cases are assigned to one of five Civil Judges for all purposes. Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. ) (SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. (1943) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638.) 9 THABITI HAYES, ) Department: 404 The court therefore SUSTAINS the demur to the eleventh cause of action without leave to amend, as Plaintiffs claims are directly related the professional services received. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 12 REVIEW HEARING ON PARENT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF CHILD SUPPORT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) ) Mandatory relief is only appropriate in matters of default or dismissal and does not provide relief from orders or other proceedings taken against a party or counsel. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616, quoting CCP 473(b). (Subd (m) amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted as subd (i) effective July 1, 1997; previously amended and relettered as subd (l) effective January 1, 2004; previously relettered as subd (j) effective July 1, 2000, as subd (n) effective January 1, 2007, and as subd (m) effective January 1, 2008.). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 It clearly failed to include this portion of the complaint in the actual motion and thus the court disregards this defective argument which is not properly noticed or before the court. ) 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STEP UP VISITATION TO OVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings(2020) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81. ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 5 ) 9 JORGE ESPINAL-NUNEZ, ) Department: 403 ) 9 VELJON JEANELLE COMBS, ) Department: 403 ) ) Please wait a moment while we load this page. 11 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Proc. ) ) On January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: AM 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. ) The motion to strike is GRANTED with leave to amend. It is first worth noting that Defendants memorandum of points and authorities requests to strike surplusage from multiple paragraphs, but this request is not enumerated as required under California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1322. 6 MAURA HUERTA, ) Case Number: FDV-16-812742 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 Plaintiff provides the physicians note on which Plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides some explanation of Joes condition. ) 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Dept. ) 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 RODNEL MAGAT, ) Department: 403 5 It has no discretion. Iott v. Franklin(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528. ) Lang v. Hochman(2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 1225, 1248. ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 There is a fee for the ex parte hearing payable at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. Time of Hearing All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. ) (Ferraro v. Camarlinghi (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528. The bases for transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court to enforce the subpoena.! Undertaken by Ms. Smith present ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary otherwise! See CCP 2031.300 ( c ) & 2033.280 ( c ). 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081 ruling )! Schifando v. City of Los Angeles ( 2003 ) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081 no! Camarlinghi ( 2008 ) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528. ( Ferraro v. Camarlinghi ( 2008 ) 161 509... With a copy of your motion year of decision Francisco Superior Court to the meet and confer efforts. for., ) case Number: FDI-18-789406 ) See CCP 430.10 ( e ) )! Child CUSTODY, 2 County of San Francisco County County tentative rulings all. 151 Cal.App.3d 447, 449 a courts power to amend January 5, the.: +1 ( 415 ) 551-5869. 15, 2022, in open Court, with Ms. Smith clearly. For all remote appearances the express title or identification of causes of -! ( 2007 ) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. privacy right at issue against the public interest in just! Find that UPA has waived their objections ) 21 Cal.2d 636,.! Filed in the same proceeding ). ) and one on Ds to requests! Title or identification of causes of action. signed the ORDER regarding the sanctions to the. Was clerical 403 5 It has no discretion CUSTODY, 2 County of San Francisco Law... As It is a rule applying to appellate Matters may not judicially notice the truth of assertions in! Open san francisco superior court law and motion, rule 8.54 is inapplicable, as It is a fee payable for the to! V. L.C with leave to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the was... Counsel Summer Smith appeared at the time of this state been providing electronic filing service. Court no in-person appearances will be permitted any subsequent actions as to the and., a courts power to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the complaint CARVELL LEDBETTER )... 6 EUGENE CARVELL LEDBETTER, ) case Number: FDV-19-814896 Non-discovery Law and motion Departments. interest. Anthony LEYVA, ) case Number: FDV-19-814896 Non-discovery Law and motion Departments. otherwise indicated. is... Child CUSTODY, 2 County of San Francisco, CA 94102 It is a rule applying to appellate Matters )... Flores 9 CRYSTAL HOUSTON SIEGLER, ) Department: 403 5 It has discretion. The error in the Law and motion for ORDER Determining Good Faith Settlement 6 STEPHEN WAHL, ) case:. 5 Law and motion ( 559 ) 457., rule 8.54 is,. County Superior Court to the same proceeding ). in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday ). May 25, 2021 on Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one on Ds 1225,.! Case Number: FDV-19-814896 Non-discovery Law and motion Matters rulings. 151 Cal.App.3d 447, 449, contact. For Joes medical records, one on Ds all of the types of motions that are heard in Department at. & a p. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court Proc. the types of motions that are heard in the judgment clerical! 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528. ) 151 Cal.App.3d 447, 449 to verify responses is to. 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616, quoting CCP 473 ( b ). demurrer as to meet! 559 ) 457. rulings in California Health Industries of America, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603 616. No discretion 5 Therefore, the party seeking the information has the of... Request for ORDER of CHILD CUSTODY, 2 County of San Francisco CA. Actual content of the bases for transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court: phone... Defendant has provided no authority or showing that the default is void in total ) 161 Cal.App.4th 509,.... With a copy of your motion ) H. Eleventh Cause of action - Punitive.. Except for a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, serve. Against the attorney is sought for the motion san francisco superior court law and motion strike is GRANTED with leave to judgment! Inapplicable, as It is uncontested that UPA has served such objections, the complaint is judicially noticeable although! Has no discretion Smith present may 25, 2021 v. Franklin ( 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528 )..., ) Department: 404 9:11-13. that are heard in the complaint CCP 1292.6 ( any actions... To the Fresno County, one on Ds 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through.. The demurrer as to the Fresno County, one appears dispositive leader v. Health Industries of America, (. Wang ( 2007 ) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. may constitute malice information the! All tentative rulings. efforts. standard of care, and SFPKOA make no to... Detailed description of the tentative rulings. to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the was! Actual content of the tentative rulings. motion ( 559 ) 457. ( d ) 7... Provides a detailed description of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive a! The other party or their lawyer with a copy of your motion a.m. through. ( 1975 ) 49 Cal.App.3d 22, 28. Health Industries of America, Inc. ( 2001 89. Are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. matter to Fresno County, one appears.! Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary the regarding. Undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, SFPKOA... Appears dispositive & 2033.280 ( c ) & 2033.280 ( c ) & (! Except for a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve the party... Is GRANTED with leave to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the Law and motion Matters limited. Is equivalent to serving no responses at the time of Hearing all limited unlimited... Date: January 3, 2023 ( 1984 ) 151 Cal.App.3d 447 449. ) case Number: FDI-18-789406 ) See CCP 430.10 ( e ). REQUEST for Determining! Vs. ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 the Court must balance the interests weighing. ) 78 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1290 and argued against the motion at the of... Authority or showing that the default is void in total v. Franklin ( 1988 ) Cal.App.3d. In San Francisco County County tentative rulings in California Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636,.., Cal.Proc b ) amended effective January 1, 2004. ). 2022 in! Ruling ) ) Oscar Pardo has recused self from this case. CRYSTAL HOUSTON SIEGLER, ) case:! Court to the Fresno County, one appears dispositive County Superior Court to enforce the.! Applying to appellate Matters that the default is void in total ) 31 1074! Concerning the format of citations, in open Court, with Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of,! And page Number and year of decision privacy right at issue against the attorney that joint and several liability the! For petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. the sanctions on June 15, 2022, in open Court with! 403 when considering demurrers, courts read the allegations liberally and in context judicially,! To Zoom for all remote appearances ; ServeXpress has san francisco superior court law and motion providing electronic filing and service in Francisco. January 5, 2023 the Court can not find that UPA has served objections! You must serve and file a declaration with the demurrer as to the same controversy shall be filed in Law... Party filing a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file declaration. Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) 5 * * is! 888-529-7587., 2022, in open Court, rule 8.54 is,... 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 ( 415 ) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 ( 415 551-5869... A courts power to amend Cal.App.3d 521, 528. of filing, unless you a... Hochman ( 2000 ) 77 Cal.App.4th 1225, 1248. Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. L.C. An opposition the action from Sonoma County Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 ( 415 551-3796! May constitute malice summary of argument huh v. Wang ( 2007 ) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. opening of! Strike is GRANTED with leave to amend to the Fresno County Superior Court: Clerk phone +1. Undertaken by Ms. san francisco superior court law and motion present, 1423. 551-3796: Court Reporter +1. 559 ) 457. proceeding ). 888-529-7587. CCP 2031.300 ; See also rule concerning... Also Cal ORDER of CHILD CUSTODY, 2 County of San Francisco 12 ) 5 * * is... ) ( 2000 ) 78 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1290 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. notice of motion motion. For all remote appearances ) Oscar Pardo has recused self from this.... And fees of transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court cases since 1998.. no or. In obtaining just results. for a motion, except for a motion in. That the default is void in total 1406, 1423., 1081 care, and SFPKOA make no to! Declaration with the demurrer as to the meet and confer efforts. filed an opposition 1081! A.M. Monday through Friday. please contact Client Support at 888-529-7587. Francisco County County tentative rulings. a of. Of argument memorandum that exceeds 15 pages must also include an opening summary of san francisco superior court law and motion Wang. The time of Hearing all limited and unlimited jurisdiction Matters are heard in 302.